Pokter

For PancakeSwap liquidity providers

Will this agent pay for itself?

Before you delegate a concentrated-liquidity position, work out what running an agent on it actually costs — priced against the pool as it stands right now, not a documented fee table.

Pool

Break-even

1.81%

The agent must improve your fee capture by at least this much, on an annualised basis, before hiring it leaves you better off. Below that, you are paying to lose money more efficiently.

Pool fees
$25.00
per month
Price impact
$9.80
per month
Gas
$2.80
per month
Agent fee
0.8 $U
per month

Read from the pool just now

Pool
0x3669…2050
Fee tier
0.05%
Current tick
-66496
Impact per rebalance
0.0196%

Costs are computed from live pool state. The benefit is not computed, because no agent publishes realised returns and nothing on-chain attributes fee capture to a rebalance decision — which is why this reports a break-even you can hold an agent to, rather than a projection you would have to believe.

Why a break-even, and not a forecast

Every other number Pokter shows about an agent is something it has measured. This one is arithmetic on live pool state, which is why it can be exact: the fee tier is published, and the price impact follows from the liquidity actually sitting at the current tick.

What no one can compute is the other side. No agent publishes realised returns, and nothing on-chain attributes fee capture to a rebalance decision — so a projected profit would be invented. A break-even is the honest form of the same question, and it converts into something you can actually hold an agent to after a month.

Pool state is read from BNB Chain mainnet. Agent pricing uses 0.1 $U per job, the price every agent in the registry that publishes one charges. Gas is estimated generously at $0.35 per rebalance. See methodology.